Current:Home > MyJudge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation -Infinite Edge Learning
Judge strikes down Biden administration program shielding immigrant spouses from deportation
View
Date:2025-04-17 12:41:22
A federal judge on Thursday struck down a Biden administration policy that aimed to ease a path to citizenship for some undocumented immigrants who are married to U.S. citizens.
The program, lauded as one of the biggest presidential actions to help immigrant families in years, allowed undocumented spouses and stepchildren of U.S. citizens to apply for a green card without first having to leave the country.
The temporary relief from deportation brought a brief sense of security to some 500,000 immigrants estimated to benefit from the program before Texas-based U.S. District Judge J. Campbell Barker put it on hold in August, days after applicants filed their paperwork.
Barker ruled Thursday that the Biden administration had overstepped its authority by implementing the program and had stretched the legal interpretation of relevant immigration law “past its breaking point.”
The short-lived Biden administration initiative known as “Keeping Families Together” would have been unlikely to remain in place after Donald Trump took office in January. But its early termination creates greater uncertainty for immigrant families as many are bracing for Trump’s return to the White House.
Trump’s election victory this week sets the stage for a swift crackdown on undocumented individuals after the Republican ran on promises of “mass deportation.” The president-elect energized his supporters on the campaign trail with a litany anti-immigrant statements, including that immigrants were “poisoning the blood” of the nation.
During his first term, Trump appointed Barker as a judge in Tyler, Texas, which lies in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a favored venue for advocates pushing conservative arguments.
Barker had placed the immigration initiative on hold after Texas and 15 other states, led by their Republican attorneys general, filed a legal challenge accusing the executive branch of bypassing Congress to help immigrant families for “blatant political purposes.”
Republicans argued the initiative created costs for their states and could draw more migrants to the U.S.
The policy would have applied to people who have been living continuously in the U.S. for at least 10 years, do not pose a security threat and have utilized the existing legal authority known as “parole in place” that offers deportation protections.
Those married to a citizen by June 17, the day before the program was announced, could pay a $580 application fee and fill out a lengthy application explaining why they deserve humanitarian parole. If approved, applicants would have three years to seek permanent residency and obtain work authorization.
It was not immediately clear Thursday whether anyone had received approval under the program, which only accepted applications for about a week before the federal judge placed it on hold.
Noncitizen spouses are already eligible for legal status but often have to apply from their home countries. The process typically includes a years-long wait outside of the U.S., which can separate family members with different immigration statuses.
veryGood! (8365)
Related
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- Israel summons Irish ambassador over tweet it alleges doesn’t adequately condemn Hamas
- Environmental protesters board deep-sea mining ship between Hawaii and Mexico
- Max Verstappen caps of historic season with win at Abu Dhabi F1 finale
- House passes bill to add 66 new federal judgeships, but prospects murky after Biden veto threat
- Terry Venables, the former England, Tottenham and Barcelona coach, has died at 80
- Mega Millions winning numbers for Black Friday drawing; Jackpot at $305 million
- Teenage murder suspect escapes jail for the second time in November
- $73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
- Skyscraper-studded Dubai has flourished during regional crises. Could it benefit from hosting COP28?
Ranking
- South Korean president's party divided over defiant martial law speech
- Black Women Face Disproportionate Risks From Largely Unregulated Toxic Substances in Beauty and Personal Care Products
- Beijing court begins hearings for Chinese relatives of people on Malaysia Airlines plane
- Pope Francis has a hospital checkup after coming down with the flu
- The company planning a successor to Concorde makes its first supersonic test
- Man pleads to 3rd-degree murder, gets 24 to 40 years in 2016 slaying of 81-year-old store owner
- Michigan football has shown it can beat Ohio State. Now it's time to beat everyone else.
- Jalen Hurts runs for winning TD in overtime, Eagles rally past Josh Allen, Bills 37-34
Recommendation
What do we know about the mysterious drones reported flying over New Jersey?
Rural medics get long-distance help in treating man gored by bison
Man killed after shooting at police. A woman was heard screaming in Maryland home moments before
Kourtney Kardashian’s Son Reign Disick Reveals How He Wants to Bond With Baby Brother
Brianna LaPaglia Reveals The Meaning Behind Her "Chickenfry" Nickname
From 'Butt Fumble' to 'Hell Mary,' Jets can't outrun own misery in another late-season collapse
Coming playoff expansion puts college football fans at top of Misery Index for Week 13
Georgia case over railroad’s use of eminent domain could have property law implications